Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Josh Powell Investigated for Child Porn

The children are now safe with Chuck Cox. 


Josh Powell Investigated on Child Porn Charges

The children of missing Utah mom Susan Cox Powell were placed in the custody of her parents today after a state attorney said that their father, Josh Powell, is being investigated on the same voyeurism and child porn charges that his father was arrested on last week.
The two boys had been living with Josh and his father, Steve Powell, since Susan’s disappearance in 2009. But when a police search of the Powell’s Puyallup, Wash., home allegedly turned up thousands of images of naked women and young girls taken without their knowledge, Steve Powell was arrested and the children were placed in protective custody.
Susan Powell’s parents, Chuck and Judy Cox, filed for custody of the children following Steve Powell’s arrest.
An attorney for Child Protective Services told the court today that Josh Powell, too, is being investigated on the charges, though he could not divulge any further information, according to ABC affiliate KOMO-TV in Seattle.
Please note that privacy laws preclude him from much release.  Even during court, a judge must order a child protective worker to testify, first clearing the courtroom of all non-family members by way of standard operating procedure. 
Josh Powell told the court he never saw any pornography at the house in Puyallup, and that there was no “clear and present danger” to his children, KOMO reported. He also said that he would be moving out of his father’s home and that the family would not post bail for Steve Powell.
This is the first break between father and son, and may lead to one or the other giving up the location of Susan's remains. 
Josh Powell is the only named person of interest in his wife’s disappearance, and the Cox’s attorney told the courtroom today that his clients believe he is solely responsible for their daughter’s disappearance.
Josh Powell denies any involvement in whatever happened to his wife.
I did not harm her, I did not have anything to do with her disappearance,” Josh said at today’s court hearing. “I love my wife. I have looked for her in my own private way.

Note "harm" instead of kill as minimizing language, often heard in guilty statements.  This also raises the question:  Did Steve Powell kill her for Josh Powell?  With father and son no longer unified, we may soon learn, if indeed they do not post bail for Steve Powell, that he retaliates in anger, against his son, as his own perversion precludes such things as loyalty. 
Please note that he added the words "in my own private" way for searching.  What would be his "own" way?  What would be his own "private" way?  The additional words and minimizing language show that his denial is unreliable. 

No comments:

Post a Comment