Sunday, August 5, 2007

A Room With a View (RR)

by E.M.Forster

Started: 2 August 2007
Finished: 5 August 2007

Unfortunately, I didn't record my first journey down the Arno with Lucy Honeychurch and her spinster cousin, Charlotte Bartlett. All I know is that it was some years ago and I enjoyed it immensely. Of course, I'm speaking metaphorically; I'm really referring to my first reading of the most humorous of Mr. Forster's main novels. My Forster anthology is heavily highlighted, reminiscent of those days when I color-coded my book defacings according to some mysterious system lost to time. I devoured A Room With a View, Howard's End and A Passage to India all in fairly quick succession.

A Room With A View is one of my all-time favorites stories. It was for that reason I gave it to a dear friend for her birthday.

There are many things I like about Room: the lavish settings, clever dialogue, humorous characters and nostalgic simplicity. But I really like the title of the book and I think Forster was inspired in his choice.

Initially, it seems to refer to a silly dispute in the opening chapter of the book; a misunderstanding over a social convention of the day. Were the ladies -- Lucy and Charlotte, traveling in Florence at the turn of the 20th century -- allowed to accept rooms from gentlemen they hardly knew? Can they obtain a 'room with a view' because 'ladies like views and men don't care about them?' But in actuality, I believe that situation to be an entertaining representation of our creative author's true motive behind his choice of title; the story's title really pertains to perspective and allowing ourselves perspective in life, or a wider view. Perhaps in some cases, simply opening ones' eyes in the first place.

Sometimes all we need do to obtain this wider view is get the right room. Other times, we need something more. An artist or photographer will tell you that you need the right vantage point to show a certain subject to it's best advantage. An author would say you need sufficient background information.

Lucy could be seen best in her music; it brought her alive. George, I believe, needs to be seen from the perspective of the unconventional pilgrim; he's a Don Quixote--eccentric, free and full of simple love. Charlotte -- well, if I tell you how Charlotte can be understood -- I shall give away the end of the story, which should not be spoiled.

As for me, well if anyone ever cares to know or understand me, they must share my stories. Without them, they will never see me in perspective.

I believe that many things -- almost all the most important things in fact -- can never be said in the dry, flat words of non-fiction, except occasionally in reflections on biography, or a full life. That is why stories are written--to explain and express the ineffable. And classic stories like Room do it best. They aren't the easiest books to read; they require effort. But then so does anything really worthwhile.

A favorite saying of mine is, "A house without books is like a room without windows." Forster, wants us to value a wider view--to desire our rooms to have views, or if we don't, at least to allow them for those who do.

My hope is that someday my friend will read this book -- and the other books I have given her -- if for no other reason than because she desires her room to have a view on mine.

The Highest Rating! *****

Monday, July 23, 2007

Vanishing Acts


by Jodi Picoult

Started: 10 July 2007
Finished: 20 July 2007

Overall Assessment/Synopsis: Hardly Picoult's best. Interesting. Wouldn't read again or recommend. About a young woman who discovers her father kidnapped her as a four year old and brought her up under an alias in New Hampshire although her mother was alive and living in Arizona; plot covers her discovery of the crime, the trial and its impact on all involved.

Memorable quotes listed below:

How little remains of the man I once was, save the memory of him! But remembering is only a new form of suffering! -Charles Baudelaire, La Fanfarlo (p71)

Nothing stands out so conspicuously, or remains so firmly fixed in the memory, as something which you have blundered. -Cicero (p133)

Is it a crime when you love someone so much that you can't stand the thought of them changing? Is it a crime when you love someone so much that you can't see them clearly? (p154)

Marry a man who loves you more than you love him. Because I have done both now, and when it is the other way around, there is no spell in the world that can even out the balance. (p159)

I never stopped hoping that you'd come home, but I did stop expecting it. (p163)

Memories aren't stored in the heart or in the head or even in the soul, if you ask me, but in the spaces between any two given people. (p225)

It is also a terrifying prospect: that the relationships we use as the cornerstones of our personalities are not given by default but are a choice; that it's all right to feel closer to a friend than we do to a parent; that someone who betrayed us in the past might be the same person with whom we build a future. (p231)

...it's crazy, isn't it, the way we always say that children belong to their parents, when it's really the other way around? (p280)

Why do they call it a mobile home if it never goes anywhere? (p388)
**

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Long Live Luna Lovegood

It's only 62 hours -- or so my sister informs me. Although by the time I finish writing this, it will probably be considerably less. 62 precious hours until the next and last installment of the Harry Potter series hits the street. We met him as an infant years ago. In my family's case, in 2000, just before Goblet of Fire was published. We have followed him ever since--through many harrowing and perilous adventures.

I enjoy the books and have participated in the family read-aloud as each new book has been published. (The family rule is no one may read the new book on his/her own until the family has first read the book together.) However, my dear children are the real fans. They have read the books countless times, listened to the books-on-tape repeatedly, written theories on how the Dark Lord will ultimately be defeated (because certainly he must!) and attended local camps where they were able to dress up in brilliant purple and blue hooded cloaks and work science experiments which were supposed to be magic.

Fantasy as a general rule is not my genre. I can read almost anything, but fantastical stories generally leave me cold. Probably because I have so little imagination...or is it too much?

But Harry Potter is different. J.K.Rowling is the creme-de-la-creme of writers. She weaves a tale with humor, irony, subtle twists, recognizable and memorable characters, and plots that are second to none. I have never run across such a fine author and I do know and love books.

All that said, I have to put in my plug for my favorite of all her characters. And to do this, I will introduce her in Rowling's own words,

'She had straggly, waist-length, dirty-blond hair, very pale eyebrows, and protuberant eyes that gave her a permanently surprised look. Harry knew at once why Neville had chosen to pass this compartment by. The girl gave off an aura of distinct dottiness. Perhaps it was the fact that she had stuck her wand behind her left ear for safekeeping, or that she had chosen to wear a necklace of butterbeer caps, or that she was reading a magazine upside down.'

Luna isn't a main character. In fact, she isn't even introduced until Book 5. More's the pity because she's absolutely charming! She's quiet, unassuming, doesn't take herself or anyone else seriously, yet has a -- if you'll forgive the pun -- a spell-binding effect on Harry. No, she doesn't become his girlfriend in any sense of the word. But twice in Book 5 she has a calming and comforting effect on Harry which no one else, including his closest friends, is able to exert. Luna's simple faith that she will one day be reunited with her deceased mother is an inspiration to Harry who has not only lost both his parents but also just watched his godfather die.

Her name is also no accident. Rowling follows in the tradition of all good British authors, in that a character's name is a clear indication of personality and temperament. Luna is Love personified and she is Good. As such, she is the frequent target of her schoolmates' pranks. They hide her things and call her names, including, "Loony," all of which she takes in stride. She is sweet-natured, and yes, a little "loony", but then when I think about it, if "Love" and "Goodness" could be personified, they might just appear a little loony.

So
the countdown marches on. And while everyone else will be watching Harry and wondering how he will defeat the Evil Dark Lord and save the Magical Community, I will be also keeping an eye out for a simple little girl with dirty-blond hair who no one pays much attention to...until she says something so strange they can't help noticing her. Way to go Luna!

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

the five people you meet in heaven

by Mitch Albom

Some of my favorite quotes:

-- It might seem strange to start a story with an ending. But all endings are also beginnings. We just don't know it at the time. (p1)

-- Every life has one true-love snapshot. (p9)

-- How do people choose their final words? Do they realize their gravity? Are they fated to be wise? (p13)

-- No life is a waste. The only time we waste is the time we spend thinking we are alone. (p50)

-- Dying? Not the end of everything. We think it is. But what happens on earth is only the beginning. (p91)

-- Sacrifice is a part of life. It's supposed to be. It's not something to regret. It's something to aspire to. (p93)

-- Sometimes when you sacrifice something really precious, you're not really losing it. You're just passing it on to someone else. (p94)

-- All parents damage their children. It cannot be helped. Youth, like pristine glass, absorbs the prints of its handlers. Some parents smudge, others crack, a few shatter childhoods completely into jagged little pieces, beyond repair. (p104)

-- Parents rarely let go of their children, so children let go of them. They move on. They move away. The moments that used to define them-a mother's approval, a father's nod- are covered by moments of their own accomplishments. It is not until much later, as the skin sags and the heart weakens, that children understand; their stories, and all their accomplishments, sit atop the stories of their mothers and fathers, stones upon stones, beneath the waters of love. (p126)

-- Holding anger is a poison. It eats you from inside. We think that hating is a weapon that attacks the person who harmed us. But hatred is a curved blade. And the harm we do, we do to ourselves. (p141)

-- People say they "find" love, as if it were an object hidden by a rock. But love takes many forms, and it is never the same for any man or woman. What people find then is a certain love. (p155)

-- Lost love is still love, Eddie. It takes a different form, that's all. You can't see their smile or bring them food or tousle their hair or move them around a dance floor. But when those senses weaken, another heightens. Memory. Memory becomes your partner. You nurture it. You hold it. You dance with it. (p173)

Highly Recommend! ****

Monday, July 16, 2007

Christmas in July

When I was a little girl, Christmas was my favorite day of the year. It was the day I looked forward to all year. Perhaps in that respect, I'm not so very different from most little children. I thought about it...dreamed about it...imagined it...waited for it...and waited for it...and waited for it... And after three hundred, sixty-five child-days (which every adult with a good memory knows, really equals 365 years in adult-time) Christmas finally came. And then, in the blink of an eye, it was over! Just like that! After all that waiting, bang it was over! Sure it was great. It was everything it was supposed to be--grand, glorious, glittering--just not long enough.

So, the thing to do was to figure out a way to make the Joy of the day last. Hmmm.... Sounds like a plan. Yes! That's it! The waiting period is already extended, no question about that. Now, how to draw out the all-too-short 24 hour time-frame known as Christmas Day? Can it be done? Well this child (I think I was about 8 or 9 when I gave myself over to solving this all-important problem) was determined to find the way!

For the next year, in addition to eagerly anticipating the holiday, I also contemplated ways to extend its pleasure. Ultimately, I settled on the Zen of the Present Moment, although I had no idea that my little idea actually had any type of philosophical basis. All I planned to do was stop every time I possibly could, as often I could remember to, all day Christmas Day and remind myself that it was Christmas Day. Simple, huh? Yes. Very simple. What any good Buddhist monk will tell you in your mindfulness training is called, "Be Here Now." Oh so simple in theory...oh so difficult in practice!

Be Here Now. BE in the Present Moment. Don't be in the past, or the future, or another state or with anyone else. It sounds really good. And on Christmas, or another enjoyable occasion, anyone can see why it is a good thing to do. But the trouble is, we spend so much of our lives wishing we were elsewhere, that when "Christmases" come along, we find ourselves unaccustomed to staying in the present moment, if we've ever managed to do it at all.

Today I was glad I'd had all those years of Christmas' Moments, practicing being present. Being in the moment can come in handy when unexpected Christmas experience happens.

Ever heard of Christmas in July?

Well for me, Christmas comes whenever we're given an unexpected and undeserved Gift, especially one of redemption. Today, I was given a second chance with a friend, a very, very dear friend, a friend I thought I'd lost through my own stupidity and negligence. She forgave me and we've started on Chapter Two (or is it Chapter Three, dear Joy?) of our friendship.

All day today, I kept telling myself, "It's Christmas!" Christmas in July! And I was in the Present Moment for every bit of it! Thank you Joy!

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

The Chess Set

When my only brother died—on the 6th of November 1991—he was only 29 years old and in good health, so his accidental death caught everyone by surprise. My oldest daughter, Meg, had just been born the month before. My baby sister, Julie, got married at the end of that strange and dark November. It was supposed to be a happy time for all of us; instead it was a time of extreme emotions and staggering stress.

Somehow we all got through it, although I don’t exactly remember the time clearly, only bits and pieces. I remember that Meg’s colicky screaming fits no longer bothered me after Mike’s death. I’d just hold her and cry along with her. When it came time for me to return from maternity leave to my ‘exciting’ Air Force job, Chief of the Barksdale Command Post, I had no taste for it anymore. It pained me to leave Meg in child care each day and I suddenly realized how all the rest of my life had suffered because of my total dedication to my career.

I had scarcely seen my brother a half dozen times in the past 10 years—and he was the person, after my husband--I felt closest too?! After Mike’s funeral I went with my father and sisters several times to Mike’s house, looking, searching through his things. I didn’t want any of them. I even wondered at stories I’d read and heard about people fighting over the deceased person’s possessions. How could they? I loved my brother fiercely but I wanted none of his things.

My Dad kept trying to interest me in Mike’s books (I love books!) or his CD’s but I could only muster a half-hearted glance at a few things before my eyes misted over and I wanted to scream, “I don't want any of his things! I WANT MY BROTHER!!!!!!” But I stifled this desire. Even in this state of raw and self-centered emotion, I recognized my Dad’s sorrow as deeper and purer than my own.

I was at Mike’s house to help sort and bundle his things to be given away to various charitable organizations, but I doubt I was any help to anybody. I just kept wandering around, not really seeing, crying every once in awhile, confused and lost. If I thought about God at all, it was more with bitterness and anger than as a source of comfort and compassion. After all, hadn’t God taken my brother? Wasn’t this terrible pain His fault? What kind of cruel God would poison the joy of the birth of the first child (for me) and grandchild (for my parents) with death? And what about Julie’s wedding? How would she be able to enjoy her special day, with this cloud of sorrow hanging over her head? No, God had deserted us, at best; was punishing us at worst. But while I had turned away from God, I allowed myself to recognize and empathize with those around me. It wasn’t much, but it was something.

Eventually I did stumble across something among my brother's effects which did arouse my interest—letters and pictures. Mostly they were letters he’d received, but there were a few he’d written (including one to me) and not sent. I had something tangible to hang on to. My dad indicated Meg’s birth announcement which was proudly displayed on a shelf. “I don’t want it back!” I thought. Or did I say it?

Then Dad brought me a ceramic chess set which I’d made for Mike 10 years back. It was still in the same shoe box wrapped in yellowed newspaper. Had he even used it? This was too much.

“No!” I said firmly, “I don’t want it!” No one in the family, besides Mike, played chess so one of my sisters started to take it to put in the discard/give away pile.

“No!” Dad said, equally firmly, “we’ll keep it.” Dad was feeling sentimental too, I thought. He never saved anything that wasn’t useful. He’d been very adept at pitching anything and everything. Nostalgia was not a consideration in our family--if you weren't using it, you got rid of it. The Donovans were practical folk.

Nothing more was said. I left Mike’s house that day with 3 children’s books (for Meg), 2 CDs, a small electronic keyboard and a box of letters and pictures. Not much to show for 29 years of life, but it was more than I wanted even so.

A year later I gave birth to my second daughter and named her Michelle after her much beloved uncle. During those brief and busy months, I’d started to pray again and was beginning to turn to God, occasionally. God was no longer ‘the enemy’ but I still regarded Him with suspicion and well-founded (so I thought!) mistrust. If I could have defined my concept of my LORD in those days, I think I viewed Him as an angry storm which comes, destroys everything and then leaves, allowing His poor creatures to rebuild their pitiful lives—only to live in fear and suspicion, nervously awaiting another vengeful visit. I prayed in those days to placate God, in the hopes that He’d leave me alone.

But I had abandoned my Air Force career and devoted all my waking hours (which were many) to my husband and daughters. In time, I came to realize that Mike’s death—even more so than Meg’s birth—was a pivotal point in my life. Many women abandon successful careers when their first or second child comes along. But with 13 years in the AF, I hadn’t intended to quit when I was so close to the retirement finish line. And I wasn’t altogether sure I wanted any more children. If I only had Meg, I could give everything to her, couldn’t I? Everything that is, but a sibling… And didn’t Mike’s death teach me how precious that relationship could be?

In the ensuing years, death continued to be a wake-up call for me. Two uncles, two aunts, my last grandparent, several friends, and people my husband worked with. Each death—strangely—refocused my life, my vision of life and my relationship with God. My daughters grew and as I got to know them, I learned to love all over again. God became very real, very close and a good friend. I still didn’t begin to understand Him, but a 1000 little things each day pointed to His love for me and mine: Michelle’s beautiful singing and Meg’s love for horses; their hugs, chatter, giggles, pictures, pranks, and delightful games; the love and strong faith of the girls’ four grandparents; teaching Meg and Michelle to read; watching them become ardent readers like their mom and uncle; my husband’s patience and support; family reunions and weddings; rediscovering the richness of our faith heritage when I began to homeschool; prayer groups; trips around Washington state, Oklahoma and back to visit family; dear friends; visiting the sick from church etc. My life was so different from what it had been when all my time and energy were devoted to success in my career. I had rediscovered family, values and my relationship with our loving and very intimate Heavenly Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Life was very good and very full. As most children do, the girls begged for stories and I told them every story I could remember about my brother and my sisters, Patti and Julie. I think I can say—without boasting—that I kept Michael alive in their memories. And each year when Mike’s bday came around I baked a cake and the girls eagerly joined me in singing “Happy Birthday Uncle Mike” and feasting on chocolate cake—because the girls were sure that was his favorite cake. And when the anniversary of his death came—eventually—I was able to celebrate that day too, although in a quieter and more personal communion with my ‘little brother’.

But as the years slipped by, I began to lose the feeling of Mike’s presence. It almost seemed that as the pain lessened, so did the strength and power of the memories. I couldn’t picture his face (in my mind) or recall his voice without getting out his picture and staring at it. His picture hung over Michelle’s bed and I had others scattered around the house, but they became lifeless. Strange as it sounds, I found myself missing the sharp pang I used to feel when I thought about missing him! Am I losing him, God? My faith taught me he was safe and pain free with the Lord or perhaps still undergoing the necessary purgation in preparation for that glorious reunion. I refused to believe he was damned. He wasn’t perfect, but he was so dearly beloved by so many people when he died, I just knew he hadn’t turned his back definitely on God, so I had Faith and Hope. In keeping with our Roman Catholic tradition, my family and friends prayed and offered Masses and sacrifices for the salvation of his soul and those of others we loved. But, I couldn’t help wondering, if Mike isn’t lost, why do I feel like I’m losing him?

As Meggie’s First Communion approached, I confided this fear to a dear friend. Michael was Meg’s Godfather and I wished fervently that he could sit with our family in church and witness the joy of this occasion. Briefly I did feel that old familiar ache but my renewed faith told me that Mike would be with us in spirit. It was enough, I told myself sensibly. But even so, I admitted my true feelings to my friend. She assured me with confidence and wisdom that Michael would be at Meg’s Communion as he was with me in a very real way every day. Yes, I agreed and I offered a little prayer of thanksgiving to God for my friend and my brother.

Two weeks before the day, I came up behind Michelle at the computer playing chess. “Wow!” I said, “I didn’t know you could play chess.” I was impressed—not bad for a 7 year old, I thought.

“Yes,” she answered ambivalent of my praise, “but I don’t like playing it on the computer because the computer always wins. Meg and I want to play each other and then the game will be more fair.” “Meg can play too?!” I was really surprised. Meg shares my dislike of anything mechanical, especially computers.

“She likes chess too, but doesn’t like playing with the computer either,” Michelle assured me. That I could believe.

“Too bad,” I mused, “I don’t remember what we did with that chess set…”

“You have a chess set?!” Michelle’s eyes lighted up and she gave me her full attention.

“I made one for Uncle Mike years ago, but I can’t remember what happened to it. I’ll ask Grandma if she still has it. Don’t get your hopes up; it was a long time ago and Grandma and Paw Paw (my parents) don’t keep things around if they aren’t being used.”

“But you will ask them right?” Michelle asked with serious and earnest eagerness.

“Yes, I’ll ask,” I promised. But no, my mom said we’d gotten rid of the chess set years ago at a family garage sale. Not to worry I told the girls, “Daddy and I will get you a chess set for your birthday or Christmas.” The girls’ faces fell with disappointment.

Again, I was surprised. I was with them every day, but since our computer was in a back room, I didn’t realize how much they’d played chess. All I knew was their computer wasn’t connected to the Internet and I’d checked out all the software on it. And they were required to ‘play’ with the computer 30 minutes a day.

The day before the First Communion I chanced to check my email and there was a message from my Mom. “Guess what? Julie has the chess set. She’ll bring it down tomorrow.” I couldn’t believe it. After all these years…

The next day arrived and our house was a flurry with out-of-town relatives from Missouri, Indiana and Kansas. Everyone arrived safely and our house was a buzz with doorbells, laughter, hugs, phone ringing and all the sounds of familiar voices. My sister Julie arrived with her husband and two sons. I marveled over the fact that if not for a scheduling conflict, we would have had Meg’s First Communion in May and Julie wouldn’t have been able to come. I remembered how flustered I’d been at the time, wondering how I’d be able to secure a week-end acceptable to most (if not all) of our family. My husband, Rod, reminded me to turn things over to the LORD. I had and now He was showing me His magnificent Love and Grace.

Michelle came up to me and motioned for me to lean down for a whispered confidence. “Did Aunt Julie remember the chess set?” I smiled at her and whispered back, “I don’t know but I’ll ask her.” I did and Julie jumped to her feet and went back outside. A few moments later she brought in a very old-looking shoe box with the words, “Chess Set - $8” written in my handwriting on the top of the box.

“That’s pretty bad,” I joked, “We couldn’t even sell it for $8.” But my words were lost in the excitement of Meg and Michelle digging out the pieces from yellowed newspaper.

“I’m glad you didn’t sell it,” Meg said emphatically and I began to see the whole scene in a new light—the still fresh light of her innocent and hopeful 8 year old eyes. Soon all the pieces were unwrapped, the girls had dug out an old checkers' board and were happily absorbed in a fast-paced game of chess.

As I sat back watching them, I thought of my friend’s words about Mike being with us on this day. I marveled at the appearance of the chess set on the exact day of Meg’s First Communion, a chess set I’d seen perhaps twice in the past 20 years, the only thing I ever made for my brother. A feeling came over me I can’t quite explain, but it was more real than the black and white pieces in front of me.

“How did you manage it Mike?” I wondered silently. How indeed? It was too strange, too unreal, too coincidental… “You are here, aren’t you Little Brother,” I thought and the ache in my heart was as sharp as it had ever been. And I knew how he ‘managed it’. It wasn’t a coincidence; it was a God-incidence.

The rest of the day passed in a blur of conversation, prayer, photos and hugs. It was a wonderful day—too full to visit with each of our guests as I’d have liked to do, but a nice time even so. After church, dinner at a local restaurant and coming back to our house for cake and coffee, eventually the day came to an end and we were saying ‘good night’ to those of our guests who weren’t staying with us. As my uncle and aunt, who live in Kansas, were getting into their car, I heard my mom call out, “Good night Little Brother” and he called back, “Good night Big Sister” and it seemed as if Mike was talking to me. It was the way Mike and I had always addressed each other, although I do not remember ever hearing my mom and her brother address each other that way before.

Good night Little Brother. I look forward to seeing you again someday! Thank You Heavenly Father for letting Mike join us—in a special way on this special day.

Sunday, June 17, 2007

Is Education Wasted on the Young?

Originally Written for the Family Magazine Summer 2006 Edition

Sorry Meg and Michelle and every else under 30 reading this—I mean no insult by the subject question. It’s rhetorical in nature and just thrown out as something to ponder, mostly by those of us who no longer are . . . young. Was our education a waste?

Speaking strictly for myself, I believe I had the best education my parent’s hard-earned money could buy. That is, I was given the opportunity of learning what those teachers and schools taught, but did I learn? A smorgasbord of intellectual fare was spread out before my juvenile self and all I had to do was partake of what was offered. But did I feast? Did I do more than sniff at the sumptuous repast of pedagogical banquet? Like most people my age, I surreptitiously found out how little I could get away with eating before I slipped away to the “real” world. The world of academia, as we all know, is not the “real” world.

Fast forward 18 years and now the student has become the teacher. Presumably, something more than just time has passed. Somewhere along the line, I developed the desire to read for my own enlightenment, for self-improvement—if that’s possible and I believe it is—but certainly to learn for more than mere test score-maximization. There is a need in each of us, either dormant or nurtured, to know and to grow. “Life” means growth and change; where there is life, there can be no stagnation. My reading programs developed when I’d finally outgrown the effects of systemic teaching and began to seek knowledge and wisdom as the Pearl of Great Price. For the first time in my life I wanted to learn, not for a grade or a degree or to impress a boss or a teacher, but just for my own pleasure! And not an-idle-summer’s-day-amusement sort of pleasure either, but the deep, rich pleasure that comes only rarely, unexpectedly, when we say can say, “Aha!” or, “WOW!” Moments C.S. Lewis called, “Joy”. Sometimes these moments come during prayer, often they occur during quiet or service; they can also happen when one is engaged in serious, reflective, and contemplative study of the mysterious, marvels of this wonderful world in which we live.

During my daughter’s school year, I would read books having to do with their academics, but every summer . . . Ah summer! I would treat myself to some long-neglected classic, something I knew would stretch me and yet something I also hoped I would enjoy.

This summer I decided to tackle the mother of all novels, the book everyone jokes about and sadly few read, War and Peace. It really is sad, because it’s the best book, without exception, I’ve read in a long, long time—well at least since The Brothers Karamazov. There is something about the Russian authors . . . ! But I digress!

The real difficulty in reading W&P isn’t the length, although that can be daunting, it’s the fact that the story goes back and forth between, War, and, Peace. For those unfamiliar with W&P, it occurs during the Napoleonic era (early 19th century) primarily in Russia with a few battles in other parts of Europe.

So the “trouble” with W&P is also its richness: the parts which interest one audience – the War parts – generally won’t interest those who will prefer the Peace parts. I confess to prefer the Peace parts—the interaction between the people. Had I read this book when I was younger, for a class or a test, I’d most likely have skim-read the War parts. True confession time. However, since those days I’ve learned the value of working through the “hard” things. I’ve also learned a few ‘tricks of the trade’ of learning.

Whenever I want to be sure to really appreciate a book these days—especially one where translation, dialect, customs, and/or time period may render understanding opaque—I rely on audio books, one of the best inventions since books themselves. I purchased the MP3 audio book of W&P (produced by Blackstone Audio and read by Frederick Davidson.) Now some would call that cheating; but it certainly isn’t faster. Word for word, I can read the book faster than I can listen to it. And in fact, I often listened to parts of it, and then read them, or vice versa, especially during the battle scenes because I knew I needed to go over those parts twice or more in order to really understand what was happening. (I didn’t say I was any smarter now that I was older—just that I work at it harder.) Davidson’s rendering of any story is superb by the way; W&P is no exception. His characterizations combined with the maps and information I found at the website on Wikipedia, especially when it came to the battle of Austerlitz, made it possible for me to not only read, but actually experience, the Napoleonic Wars and 19th century Russian society through the eyes of Tolstoy. Did you know that the Battle of Austerlitz was when the Roman Empire officially came to an end? I didn’t, but I do now.

Do I wish I had read War and Peace when I was younger? Yes and No. But a more relevant question is, will you read War and Peace? I certainly hope so!

And to answer my original Editorial question, “Is Education wasted on the Young?” OF COURSE NOT! Education is never wasted on anyone, ever. PERIOD. That’s the point! We’re never too young, nor too old to keep learning, so long as we’re still ALIVE! Our Creator gave us brains as well as hearts and bodies; He expects us to use them.

Happy Living! Happy Learning!