So now it's 2 and 2...two Federal Judges have ruled against the legislation, and two for it. The Supreme Court will have the final say.
The main objection seems to be that it is wrong for the Government to force us to buy a product, namely, insurance.
Then why it OK for the states to force their residents to buy car insurance?
Is it somehow OK for the states to crush their people under oppressive regulation, but not for the Feds?
Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange says the same kind of legal rationale that went into the law would allow the feds to force people to "drink a particular kind of coffee".
And he's a lawyer, so he should know.
The main objection seems to be that it is wrong for the Government to force us to buy a product, namely, insurance.
Then why it OK for the states to force their residents to buy car insurance?
Is it somehow OK for the states to crush their people under oppressive regulation, but not for the Feds?
Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange says the same kind of legal rationale that went into the law would allow the feds to force people to "drink a particular kind of coffee".
And he's a lawyer, so he should know.
No comments:
Post a Comment